Skip to content
Wildcard

Wildcard → Lag Board → Charles Barkley

Charles Barkley vs Michael Jordan

1986-87 Fleer #7 against 1986-87 Fleer #57 — measured, not predicted.

Building a baseline Same set Basketball

Measuring Charles Barkley against Michael Jordan — 7 of 8 observations needed before a baseline means anything.

Ratio now
3.7%
Baseline
not established yet
Vs baseline
—
Observations
7
Michael Jordan, 30d
-2.8%
Charles Barkley, 30d
+7.4%
☆ Watch Charles Barkley's card

Saves Charles Barkley's 1986-87 Fleer #7 to your watchlist, where the daily scan flags listings priced under that card's own comparable sales. That is a different question from this board: the watchlist will not tell you when this ratio moves, and nothing here alerts on the gap.

held out of the baseline3%3.5%4%4.5%4 Sep — 3.6% peer $170 / anchor $4,7585 Sep — 3.6% peer $170 / anchor $4,7586 Sep — 3.9% peer $170 / anchor $4,3887 Sep — 3.9% peer $172 / anchor $4,3888 Sep — 3.9% peer $172 / anchor $4,3889 Sep — 3.6% peer $172 / anchor $4,72910 Sep — 4% peer $189 / anchor $4,72911 Sep — 4% peer $189 / anchor $4,72912 Sep — 4.1% peer $189 / anchor $4,55414 Sep — 4.1% peer $189 / anchor $4,55415 Sep — 4.1% peer $195 / anchor $4,72916 Sep — 4.1% peer $195 / anchor $4,72917 Sep — 4.1% peer $195 / anchor $4,72918 Sep — 4.1% peer $195 / anchor $4,72919 Sep — 4.2% peer $195 / anchor $4,67720 Sep — 4.2% peer $195 / anchor $4,67721 Sep — 4% peer $189 / anchor $4,75822 Sep — 4% peer $189 / anchor $4,75823 Sep — 4% peer $189 / anchor $4,75824 Sep — 4% peer $192 / anchor $4,77925 Sep — 4% peer $192 / anchor $4,77926 Sep — 4% peer $192 / anchor $4,77927 Sep — 4% peer $192 / anchor $4,77928 Sep — 4.3% peer $179 / anchor $4,14729 Sep — 4.3% peer $179 / anchor $4,14730 Sep — 4.3% peer $179 / anchor $4,1471 Oct — 3.8% peer $179 / anchor $4,7412 Oct — 3.7% peer $179 / anchor $4,8093 Oct — 3.4% peer $162 / anchor $4,8094 Oct — 3.4% peer $162 / anchor $4,8095 Oct — 3.6% peer $162 / anchor $4,5286 Oct — 3.6% peer $162 / anchor $4,5287 Oct — 3.8% peer $170 / anchor $4,5288 Oct — 3.7% peer $170 / anchor $4,65411 Oct — 2.8% peer $555 / anchor $19,92313 Oct — 3.4% peer $157 / anchor $4,65414 Oct — 3.4% peer $157 / anchor $4,65415 Oct — 3.8% peer $174 / anchor $4,52516 Oct — 3.8% peer $174 / anchor $4,52517 Oct — 3.7% peer $169 / anchor $4,52518 Oct — 3.7% peer $169 / anchor $4,52519 Oct — 3.7% peer $169 / anchor $4,5253.7% now4 Sep19 Oct
Ratio of Charles Barkley's 1986-87 Fleer #7 to Michael Jordan's 1986-87 Fleer #57. Gold fill marks where the ratio sits below the baseline, rose where it sits above. The shaded stretch on the right is held out of the baseline on purpose — see the method below. Hover any point for its values; every number is in the table.
Every recorded observation
ObservedRatioPeerAnchorvs baseline
2026-10-193.7%$169$4,525—
2026-10-183.7%$169$4,525—
2026-10-173.7%$169$4,525—
2026-10-163.8%$174$4,525—
2026-10-153.8%$174$4,525—
2026-10-143.4%$157$4,654—
2026-10-133.4%$157$4,654—
2026-10-112.8%$555$19,923—
2026-10-083.7%$170$4,654—
2026-10-073.8%$170$4,528—
2026-10-063.6%$162$4,528—
2026-10-053.6%$162$4,528—
2026-10-043.4%$162$4,809—
2026-10-033.4%$162$4,809—
2026-10-023.7%$179$4,809—
2026-10-013.8%$179$4,741—
2026-09-304.3%$179$4,147—
2026-09-294.3%$179$4,147—
2026-09-284.3%$179$4,147—
2026-09-274%$192$4,779—
2026-09-264%$192$4,779—
2026-09-254%$192$4,779—
2026-09-244%$192$4,779—
2026-09-234%$189$4,758—
2026-09-224%$189$4,758—
2026-09-214%$189$4,758—
2026-09-204.2%$195$4,677—
2026-09-194.2%$195$4,677—
2026-09-184.1%$195$4,729—
2026-09-174.1%$195$4,729—
2026-09-164.1%$195$4,729—
2026-09-154.1%$195$4,729—
2026-09-144.1%$189$4,554—
2026-09-124.1%$189$4,554—
2026-09-114%$189$4,729—
2026-09-104%$189$4,729—
2026-09-093.6%$172$4,729—
2026-09-083.9%$172$4,388—
2026-09-073.9%$172$4,388—
2026-09-063.9%$170$4,388—

Why these two

Same set, same 132 cards, same 1984 draft class — Barkley went fifth, Jordan third — and the set is checklisted alphabetically, so the two cards were printed and pulled under identical conditions.

What would make this wrong

Barkley never won a title, and ring count is a persistent rather than cyclical input to what vintage basketball cards fetch. If that is what the gap is made of, it is a verdict the market has already reached and not one it is going to reconsider on a schedule.

How this is measured

Priced on ungraded (raw) copies, not the PSA 8 this pairing names — the price guide returned no value for those grades on this subscription, so both cards fell back to the same basis. The ratio is a like-for-like comparison and the history is sound; the grade in the card names above is what it does not describe.

Each scan records one number: the fair value of Charles Barkley's 1986-87 Fleer #7 divided by the fair value of Michael Jordan's 1986-87 Fleer #57, both from comparable sales. The baseline is the median of those observations over 90 days — excluding the most recent 21, so a fresh move cannot drag down the very number it is being measured against. Below 8 observations there is no baseline and this page says so instead of showing one.

The baseline is never authored. It is the median of what was recorded, or it does not exist. Nobody types a target ratio into this system.

This is an observation about a historical relationship, not a forecast. A gap that never closes means the market permanently re-rated Charles Barkley rather than temporarily forgot him — that is the risk in every pairing here, and it does not mean-revert on a schedule.

Look at the actual cards

Get emailed when Charles Barkley's card lists under its sold comps

eBay tells you a listing exists. Wildcard tells you it is underpriced.

The ratio above is one question; whether a specific Charles Barkley listing is cheap against its own completed sales is another. Watch the card and the daily scan emails you when one is. Free, no account.

One confirmation link, then at most one email a day, and only when a listing is under comps. Unsubscribe in one click from any alert. See what an alert looks like →