Wildcard → Lag Board → Hakeem Olajuwon
Hakeem Olajuwon vs Michael Jordan
1986-87 Fleer #82 (printed “Akeem”) against 1986-87 Fleer #57 — measured, not predicted.
In line Same set Basketball
Hakeem Olajuwon's 1986-87 Fleer #82 (printed “Akeem”) PSA 8 is at 2.2% of the Michael Jordan, in line with its 24-observation baseline of 2.1%.
- Ratio now
- 2.2%
- Baseline
- 2.1%
- Vs baseline
- +1.6%
- Observations
- 24
- Michael Jordan, 30d
- -3.2%
- Hakeem Olajuwon, 30d
- -1.3%
Saves Hakeem Olajuwon's 1986-87 Fleer #82 (printed “Akeem”) to your watchlist, where the daily scan flags listings priced under that card's own comparable sales. That is a different question from this board: the watchlist will not tell you when this ratio moves, and nothing here alerts on the gap.
Every recorded observation
| Observed | Ratio | Peer | Anchor | vs baseline |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2026-10-19 | 2.2% | $99 | $4,525 | +1.6% |
| 2026-10-18 | 2.2% | $99 | $4,525 | +1.6% |
| 2026-10-17 | 2.2% | $99 | $4,525 | +1.6% |
| 2026-10-16 | 2.3% | $103 | $4,525 | +6.3% |
| 2026-10-15 | 2.3% | $103 | $4,525 | +6.3% |
| 2026-10-14 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,654 | -9.7% |
| 2026-10-13 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,654 | -9.7% |
| 2026-10-09 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,654 | -9.7% |
| 2026-10-08 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,654 | -9.7% |
| 2026-10-07 | 2% | $90 | $4,528 | -7.1% |
| 2026-10-06 | 2% | $90 | $4,528 | -7.1% |
| 2026-10-05 | 2% | $90 | $4,528 | -7.1% |
| 2026-10-04 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,809 | -12.6% |
| 2026-10-03 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,809 | -12.6% |
| 2026-10-02 | 1.9% | $90 | $4,809 | -12.6% |
| 2026-10-01 | 1.9% | $91 | $4,741 | -10.4% |
| 2026-09-30 | 2.2% | $91 | $4,147 | +2.4% |
| 2026-09-29 | 2.2% | $92 | $4,147 | +3.7% |
| 2026-09-28 | 2.2% | $92 | $4,147 | +3.7% |
| 2026-09-27 | 1.9% | $92 | $4,779 | -10% |
| 2026-09-26 | 1.9% | $92 | $4,779 | -10% |
| 2026-09-25 | 2% | $95 | $4,779 | -7.6% |
| 2026-09-24 | 2% | $95 | $4,779 | -7.6% |
| 2026-09-23 | 2% | $95 | $4,758 | -7.2% |
| 2026-09-22 | 2% | $95 | $4,758 | -7.2% |
| 2026-09-21 | 2.1% | $100 | $4,758 | -2.1% |
| 2026-09-20 | 2.1% | $100 | $4,677 | -0.4% |
| 2026-09-19 | 2.1% | $100 | $4,677 | -0.4% |
| 2026-09-18 | 2.2% | $102 | $4,729 | +0.4% |
| 2026-09-17 | 2.2% | $102 | $4,729 | +0.4% |
| 2026-09-16 | 2.2% | $102 | $4,729 | +0.4% |
| 2026-09-15 | 2.2% | $102 | $4,729 | +0.4% |
| 2026-09-14 | 2.2% | $100 | $4,554 | +2.3% |
| 2026-09-12 | 2.3% | $104 | $4,554 | +6.5% |
| 2026-09-11 | 2.2% | $104 | $4,729 | +2.6% |
| 2026-09-10 | 2.2% | $104 | $4,729 | +2.6% |
| 2026-09-09 | 2.1% | $100 | $4,729 | -1.5% |
| 2026-09-08 | 2.3% | $100 | $4,388 | +6.2% |
| 2026-09-07 | 2.3% | $100 | $4,388 | +6.2% |
| 2026-09-06 | 2.3% | $100 | $4,388 | +6.2% |
Why these two
Both are rookie cards in the same 132-card set — Fleer's return to basketball after a 25-year absence — so they share a print run, a stock, and the grading population of a set collectors opened chasing one card. Olajuwon went first in the 1984 draft and Jordan third, which is the pairing in one line: the same class, the same set, and a market that has since priced them very differently.
What would make this wrong
The 86-87 Fleer Jordan is a market of its own and can re-rate on Jordan demand that has nothing to do with the set or with Olajuwon. A ratio that never recovers is not a discount, it is a repricing — and nothing here can tell you which one you are looking at while it is happening.
How this is measured
Priced on ungraded (raw) copies, not the PSA 8 this pairing names — the price guide returned no value for those grades on this subscription, so both cards fell back to the same basis. The ratio is a like-for-like comparison and the history is sound; the grade in the card names above is what it does not describe.
Each scan records one number: the fair value of Hakeem Olajuwon's 1986-87 Fleer #82 (printed “Akeem”) divided by the fair value of Michael Jordan's 1986-87 Fleer #57, both from comparable sales. The baseline is the median of those observations over 90 days — excluding the most recent 21, so a fresh move cannot drag down the very number it is being measured against. Below 8 observations there is no baseline and this page says so instead of showing one.
The baseline is never authored. It is the median of what was recorded, or it does not exist. Nobody types a target ratio into this system.
This is an observation about a historical relationship, not a forecast. A gap that never closes means the market permanently re-rated Hakeem Olajuwon rather than temporarily forgot him — that is the risk in every pairing here, and it does not mean-revert on a schedule.
Look at the actual cards
Get emailed when Hakeem Olajuwon's card lists under its sold comps
eBay tells you a listing exists. Wildcard tells you it is underpriced.
The ratio above is one question; whether a specific Hakeem Olajuwon listing is cheap against its own completed sales is another. Watch the card and the daily scan emails you when one is. Free, no account.
One confirmation link, then at most one email a day, and only when a listing is under comps. Unsubscribe in one click from any alert. See what an alert looks like →