Skip to content
Wildcard

Wildcard → Lag Board → Peyton Manning

Peyton Manning vs Tom Brady

1998 Bowman Chrome #1 against 2000 Bowman Chrome #236 — measured, not predicted.

Building a baseline Same era Football

Measuring Peyton Manning against Tom Brady — 6 of 8 observations needed before a baseline means anything.

Ratio now
1.7%
Baseline
not established yet
Vs baseline
—
Observations
6
Tom Brady, 30d
-2.3%
Peyton Manning, 30d
+8.3%
☆ Watch Peyton Manning's card

Saves Peyton Manning's 1998 Bowman Chrome #1 to your watchlist, where the daily scan flags listings priced under that card's own comparable sales. That is a different question from this board: the watchlist will not tell you when this ratio moves, and nothing here alerts on the gap.

held out of the baseline1.5%2%2.5%3%2 Sep — 1.6% peer $84 / anchor $5,1463 Sep — 1.5% peer $79 / anchor $5,3204 Sep — 1.5% peer $79 / anchor $5,3205 Sep — 1.5% peer $79 / anchor $5,3207 Sep — 1.5% peer $78 / anchor $5,3208 Sep — 1.5% peer $78 / anchor $5,3359 Sep — 1.5% peer $79 / anchor $5,33510 Sep — 1.6% peer $79 / anchor $5,05711 Sep — 1.6% peer $79 / anchor $5,05713 Sep — 1.6% peer $81 / anchor $5,00014 Sep — 1.6% peer $81 / anchor $5,00015 Sep — 1.6% peer $81 / anchor $5,00016 Sep — 1.6% peer $81 / anchor $5,00017 Sep — 2% peer $102 / anchor $5,00018 Sep — 2.1% peer $102 / anchor $4,83619 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81420 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81421 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81422 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81423 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81424 Sep — 1.7% peer $83 / anchor $4,81425 Sep — 1.3% peer $61 / anchor $4,72526 Sep — 1.3% peer $61 / anchor $4,72527 Sep — 1.3% peer $61 / anchor $4,72528 Sep — 1.3% peer $61 / anchor $4,72529 Sep — 1.6% peer $74 / anchor $4,72530 Sep — 1.6% peer $74 / anchor $4,7251 Oct — 1.6% peer $74 / anchor $4,7252 Oct — 1.6% peer $74 / anchor $4,7253 Oct — 1.7% peer $76 / anchor $4,5004 Oct — 1.7% peer $75 / anchor $4,2935 Oct — 1.7% peer $75 / anchor $4,2936 Oct — 1.7% peer $75 / anchor $4,2937 Oct — 1.7% peer $75 / anchor $4,3348 Oct — 1.6% peer $67 / anchor $4,3349 Oct — 1.6% peer $67 / anchor $4,33410 Oct — 3.1% peer $277 / anchor $9,05012 Oct — 3% peer $275 / anchor $9,05013 Oct — 3% peer $275 / anchor $9,16214 Oct — 1.6% peer $63 / anchor $4,05015 Oct — 1.6% peer $63 / anchor $4,05016 Oct — 1.6% peer $63 / anchor $4,05017 Oct — 1.7% peer $68 / anchor $4,05018 Oct — 1.7% peer $68 / anchor $4,05019 Oct — 1.7% peer $68 / anchor $3,9561.7% now2 Sep19 Oct
Ratio of Peyton Manning's 1998 Bowman Chrome #1 to Tom Brady's 2000 Bowman Chrome #236. Gold fill marks where the ratio sits below the baseline, rose where it sits above. The shaded stretch on the right is held out of the baseline on purpose — see the method below. Hover any point for its values; every number is in the table.
Every recorded observation
ObservedRatioPeerAnchorvs baseline
2026-10-191.7%$68$3,956—
2026-10-181.7%$68$4,050—
2026-10-171.7%$68$4,050—
2026-10-161.6%$63$4,050—
2026-10-151.6%$63$4,050—
2026-10-141.6%$63$4,050—
2026-10-133%$275$9,162—
2026-10-123%$275$9,050—
2026-10-103.1%$277$9,050—
2026-10-091.6%$67$4,334—
2026-10-081.6%$67$4,334—
2026-10-071.7%$75$4,334—
2026-10-061.7%$75$4,293—
2026-10-051.7%$75$4,293—
2026-10-041.7%$75$4,293—
2026-10-031.7%$76$4,500—
2026-10-021.6%$74$4,725—
2026-10-011.6%$74$4,725—
2026-09-301.6%$74$4,725—
2026-09-291.6%$74$4,725—
2026-09-281.3%$61$4,725—
2026-09-271.3%$61$4,725—
2026-09-261.3%$61$4,725—
2026-09-251.3%$61$4,725—
2026-09-241.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-231.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-221.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-211.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-201.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-191.7%$83$4,814—
2026-09-182.1%$102$4,836—
2026-09-172%$102$5,000—
2026-09-161.6%$81$5,000—
2026-09-151.6%$81$5,000—
2026-09-141.6%$81$5,000—
2026-09-131.6%$81$5,000—
2026-09-111.6%$79$5,057—
2026-09-101.6%$79$5,057—
2026-09-091.5%$79$5,335—
2026-09-081.5%$78$5,335—

Why these two

The same product line two years apart and the defining quarterback rivalry of the era, which makes this the nearest thing modern football has to a like-for-like pair.

What would make this wrong

Two Super Bowl wins against seven. If that is what the gap is made of, the market has reached a verdict rather than mispriced anything, and a verdict does not come back on a schedule.

How this is measured

Priced on ungraded (raw) copies, not the PSA 9 this pairing names — the price guide returned no value for those grades on this subscription, so both cards fell back to the same basis. The ratio is a like-for-like comparison and the history is sound; the grade in the card names above is what it does not describe.

Each scan records one number: the fair value of Peyton Manning's 1998 Bowman Chrome #1 divided by the fair value of Tom Brady's 2000 Bowman Chrome #236, both from comparable sales. The baseline is the median of those observations over 90 days — excluding the most recent 21, so a fresh move cannot drag down the very number it is being measured against. Below 8 observations there is no baseline and this page says so instead of showing one.

The baseline is never authored. It is the median of what was recorded, or it does not exist. Nobody types a target ratio into this system.

This is an observation about a historical relationship, not a forecast. A gap that never closes means the market permanently re-rated Peyton Manning rather than temporarily forgot him — that is the risk in every pairing here, and it does not mean-revert on a schedule.

Look at the actual cards

Get emailed when Peyton Manning's card lists under its sold comps

eBay tells you a listing exists. Wildcard tells you it is underpriced.

The ratio above is one question; whether a specific Peyton Manning listing is cheap against its own completed sales is another. Watch the card and the daily scan emails you when one is. Free, no account.

One confirmation link, then at most one email a day, and only when a listing is under comps. Unsubscribe in one click from any alert. See what an alert looks like →